Scipsy

This is for my italian readers. This morning I’ve seen a post reblogged several times, it is about a “MagLev Wind Turbine”. In the post are reported some data, and it seems that this is a new, higly efficent, wind turbine.But there’s something that sounds strange to me, for example that the post refers that this new technology was presented at Wind Power Asia 2007. Why 2007? 4 year ago…Then, if you clic on the link, it’s broken.The site of the project consist, in practice, of a unique promotional video… mmh…I’ve searched on the internet, there are a plenty of site that write over and over the same thing on this wind turbine… mmh…Then I’ve hopped on the NewScientist’s blog, here’s what I’ve found:
Could gigantic maglev wind turbines be the answer to the world’s energy problems? It’s a cool idea, but somehow I doubt it.
Still, that’s what an Arizona-based company called Maglev Wind Turbine Technologies is proposing. It wants to build enormous vertical axis turbines that would use magnetic levitation to reduce friction.On paper, the idea seems to have some merit. After all, a group of Chinese scientists did demonstrate a “maglev” wind turbine at the 2007 Wind Power Asia Exhibition in Beijing. Instead of ball-bearings it has magnetically levitated components. Scientists from Guangzhou Energy Research Institute and Guangzhou Zhongke Hengyuan Energy Science & Technology say it was up to 20% more efficient than a normal turbine and can also utilise wind speeds as low as 1.5 metres per second.Vertical-axis wind turbines also have advantages. The main benefit is that the turbine does not have to face into the wind and that the generator and gearbox can be placed on the ground. A company called Vertaxwind is even working on designs for very large off-shore vertical-axis turbines.So far, so good. But Gordon Edge at the British Wind Energy Association thinks giant maglev turbines could be pretty difficult to build."My understanding is that [maglev] only works for very small turbines," he told me. "It’s not something that’s being investigated for large machines. You’re talking about levitating a rotor of tens of tonnes which is going to require some very big magnetic fields."I guess we shouldn’t write the idea off completely, but I’ll reserve judgement before declaring the world’s energy problems solved just yet.
So, I continue to have my doubts. In these days there’s a great debate on nuclear energy, but maybe we should look for really attainable technologies.

This is for my italian readers. This morning I’ve seen a post reblogged several times, it is about a “MagLev Wind Turbine”. In the post are reported some data, and it seems that this is a new, higly efficent, wind turbine.
But there’s something that sounds strange to me, for example that the post refers that this new technology was presented at Wind Power Asia 2007. Why 2007? 4 year ago…
Then, if you clic on the link, it’s broken.
The site of the project consist, in practice, of a unique promotional video… mmh…
I’ve searched on the internet, there are a plenty of site that write over and over the same thing on this wind turbine… mmh…
Then I’ve hopped on the NewScientist’s blog, here’s what I’ve found:

Could gigantic maglev wind turbines be the answer to the world’s energy problems? It’s a cool idea, but somehow I doubt it.
Still, that’s what an Arizona-based company called Maglev Wind Turbine Technologies is proposing. It wants to build enormous vertical axis turbines that would use magnetic levitation to reduce friction.

On paper, the idea seems to have some merit. After all, a group of Chinese scientists did demonstrate a “maglev” wind turbine at the 2007 Wind Power Asia Exhibition in Beijing. Instead of ball-bearings it has magnetically levitated components. Scientists from Guangzhou Energy Research Institute and Guangzhou Zhongke Hengyuan Energy Science & Technology say it was up to 20% more efficient than a normal turbine and can also utilise wind speeds as low as 1.5 metres per second.

Vertical-axis wind turbines also have advantages. The main benefit is that the turbine does not have to face into the wind and that the generator and gearbox can be placed on the ground. A company called Vertaxwind is even working on designs for very large off-shore vertical-axis turbines.

So far, so good. But Gordon Edge at the British Wind Energy Association thinks giant maglev turbines could be pretty difficult to build.

"My understanding is that [maglev] only works for very small turbines," he told me. "It’s not something that’s being investigated for large machines. You’re talking about levitating a rotor of tens of tonnes which is going to require some very big magnetic fields."

I guess we shouldn’t write the idea off completely, but I’ll reserve judgement before declaring the world’s energy problems solved just yet.

So, I continue to have my doubts. In these days there’s a great debate on nuclear energy, but maybe we should look for really attainable technologies.


THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS / Albert Einstein; Infeld, Leopoldfrom Nasser M. Abbasi’s book list
Found: here (via sabrinacampagna)

THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS / Albert Einstein; Infeld, Leopold
from Nasser M. Abbasi’s book list

Found: here (via sabrinacampagna)

(via sabrinacampagna-deactivated2014)

Wanna See What Gold Atoms Look Like? (Look also here)
Nikola Tesla: The Other Wizard
Nikola Tesla did as much to electrify the second industrial  revolution as any man. If only his legacy weren’t marred by his portrait  as a mad scientist.

Nikola Tesla: The Other Wizard

Nikola Tesla did as much to electrify the second industrial revolution as any man. If only his legacy weren’t marred by his portrait as a mad scientist.