Scipsy

i wasnt trying to prove the validity of astrology, its not something i hold stock in whatsoever. i was merely using it to make a point. im saying that im NOT a believer of astrology, i despise it. and yet im still open minded to the possibility that there is SOMETHING interesting about it GIVEN what quantum mechanics has taught us about the apparent fractal nature of everything.

cosmicandshit

To the other followers that don’t understand what we are talking about: this thing started with this ask, continued with this other and then with my reply.

I’m not interested if you were trying to prove astrology is real, or if your was just a “we must be open-minded” king of statement.

I’m interested in the fact that your argument is just wrong.

You see, I often find this kind of argument that sound like: “oh no, you can’t dismiss *fill-with-some-pseudoscience*, quantum mechanics say this and that, so maybe…” and these arguments are plain wrong.

Even if we all love quantum mechanics (and the most of us don’t understand anything of it, we love it just because is a really well popularized topic), quantum mechanics doesn’t explain everything, particularly when its concepts are used without any competence.

What I’m saying is that: “astrology could be real because of quantum mechanics” is not just wrong in reality, is wrong even as an argument for something that could be real because of something else that is actually real.

∞ | 9:57 am | 3Feb2012 | 19♥